Why is It that All Women Ever Get to Write About is Women?

Perhaps I’m imagining it, but sometimes it feels like the only thing women get to write about is women. We can’t just write a straight article; everything that we churn out has to be given a “pop spin” or a “feminist spin” or a “feminist pop spin”. It seems to be the only way that we can make any sort of name for ourselves at all, as writers. Look, I’m doing it right now. Here I am, being a woman, writing about being a woman. Again.

A brief scan across the comment pages of a major newspaper last week brought up pieces by men about US foreign policy, human rights in Ukraine, the debate surrounding GM and the Irish referendum.  The featured pieces by women, on the other hand, are on body image, watching telly, watching adverts on the telly, and watching films in the cinema.

It can’t be that women just aren’t interested in supposedly “drier” topics, so what’s going on? Obviously, when it comes to issues surrounding feminism, misogyny, and sexualisation, women inarguably have more things to say; after all, these things affect us on a daily basis. It’s hardly a surprise that we want to write and talk about them. But how come we struggle so much to get ahead whenever we try to talk about anything else?

There’s certainly some level of tokenism at work here. Even the women in the public eye who aren’t writing or talking about feminism or gender are still questioned about it; female comedians are continually questioned about what it’s like being female and a comedian, female comic artists are continually questioned about what it’s like being female and a comic artist, female musicians are continually questioned about what it’s like being female and a musician. Things we would never dream of asking a man. Our very refusal to be defined by our gender is, in itself, defined by our gender. It’s like being stuck inside a matryoshka doll of Having A Vagina.

Image: Kate or Die

So who’s to blame? Is it the people (yes, like me) who write these articles? Is it the editors who commission the articles and choose the blog pieces? Is it the newspapers and websites and magazines that publish those articles? Is it the readers, by reacting encouragingly to the articles?

Part of me wants to conclude that it’s because, in most sectors, women are still failing to reach the highest levels. With the departure of Tina Weaver last week from the Sunday Mirror, there is now only one female editor of a national newspaper in the UK (Dawn Neeson, Daily Star). In the US, women make up 37% of newspaper employees, but less then 10% are in “supervisory or upper management positions”. And research announced recently by the BBC has found that women occupy only a third of senior positions in the workplace. The highest achievers in most professional arenas are still men, for a variety of complex and interlinking reasons: society teaches them from an early age that they should “go for” things more, that they “deserve” them more, that they can achieve and master things with more ease. Perhaps the main reason that women are only permitted to write about womanhood, feminism, and gender equality, is that these are still the only areas in which we are definitively and inarguably seen to have authority on the subject?

The truth is, when it comes to writing and having an opinion, we’re still only publicly accepted in a very narrow range of roles. There’s The Mother: the mumsnetty blogger who starts every other sentence with “As a mother”. The Lover: the writer of confessionals about their failing lovelives or torrid sexual affairs. And The Shrew: the shrill, pseudo-rabid feminazi who probably just needs a good lay (hi).

There is, of course, another form in which woman regularly appear: that of The Muse. But of course she, by definition, is never permitted self-authorship.

I’m not saying that I don’t want to see women writing about pop and gender and feminism. That would be staggeringly hypocritical of me, and besides, they’re some of my most favourite things. But I also want to see more women writing about science, about politics, about economics, about sports, about finance, about music; about everything at all under the sun.

(Actually, I take back the sports one. I don’t want to see anyone writing about sports at all, unless it is précised by an enormous headline saying “THIS IS NOT NEWS, OR INDEED IMPORTANT IN ANY WAY WHATSOEVER AT ALL TO ANYONE EVER”.)

But enough of all this moaning; I have a very important article about tits to write. We can all look forward to the inevitable response blog to this article: ‘Why is it that all women ever get to write about is women writing about women?’


5 thoughts on “Why is It that All Women Ever Get to Write About is Women?

  1. Loved this post!! You should do a sequel about “Why women only talk about men” because this article reminded me of a Miranda, Sex and the City rant. You are totally right. So here’s a little (very little) article, by a woman, not about women. Hope you enjoy:

    I recently went to a great political website that has a whole list of “Topics in the News”. I find that highly encouraging, since I am one of those people who don’t watch the news, but merely uses my Weatherbug app to find out if I really want to go outside today.

    This list has all the issues our Presidential candidates are going to argue about. The problem comes when I don’t know half of the issues and when I follow their link to have it explained to me, I don’t understand half of what they’re saying. This could be because I don’t like politics in general, but I think they should write this stuff so even a child could understand it.

    Perhaps then more people would be aware of issues, vote, and not stick us with a lousy President. –Nicola B

  2. Oh I totally agree with this. I find it so depressing in fact. Take today’s Guardian CiF. Men write about Russia, Europe, the economy and Barbara Ellen serves up something on what Hilary Clinton wears (link below). As if comments on politicians clothing all women can contribute. Thank goodness for Polly Toynbee or would sink into depressed mire – http://m.guardian.co.uk/ms/p/gnm/op/sAhs-667MhffRtaZeN_6iuA/view.m?id=15&gid=commentisfree/2012/jun/10/barbara-ellen-hillary-clinton-image&cat=commentisfree

  3. I agree except for the depressingly small minded paragraph about sport. Substitute the word sport for fashion, art, film, politics and you have the same effect. I understand you’ve shut the door to all sport (which seems counter to your otherwise open-minded attitude to basically everything) but lots of people (of both genders) enjoy playing, watching and writing about sport. It’s fine that you don’t but CAPS SCREAMING about it out of nowhere kind of soured an excellent article for me.

    1. Yeah I just put that bit in to annoy you John.

      (Actually I put it in as a humorous aside which was meant in a completely tongue-in-cheek manner, hence the I AM BEING OVER THE TOP AND YOU SHOULDN’T TAKE ME SERIOUSLY capital letters)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s